All sermons

Don't Skip the Names — Where the Theology Gets Lived

November 12, 2023 · Colossians 4:7-18 · Colossians

The Big Idea

The names at the end of Colossians aren't filler—they're the theological argument made flesh, and the whole letter's case for relational righteousness lives or dies on whether actual people with actual names actually live it.

Central Image

Paul's untrained chicken-scratch signature at the close of the letter—illegible next to the scribe's clean text, but legally binding—mirrors what Colossians has been saying all along: it's the relationship that makes it real, not the rule set.

The Turn

The greetings at the end of Paul's letters are what you skip once you've read the good stuff—the sermon shows they're the place where the theology stops being theoretical and has to be inhabited.

Outline

Bad Religion Runs on Control, Not Grace

Every broken religious system—from the personality cult in California to the congregation fighting over piano—depends on rules to keep people inside. Grace threatens that because it hands the relationship with God directly to the person and removes the leverage. Colossians unwraps that sweater the whole way. The freedom to think, try things, fail, and try again—Toby's read is that this is the engine underneath two thousand years of Western progress, and it runs on what Colossians establishes: relational righteousness instead of rules-based righteousness.

What We Don't Have, and Why That's Good

There's no record of what a Sunday morning at Colossae looked like. That's not a gap—it's a feature. If we had it, we'd make an idol of it and fight over who could do it harder. The difference Toby pressed: moral principles that flow from the nature of God are eternal. Rules that exist to help people gather on a Sunday morning are provisional. Not the same category. Not the same stakes.

The Human Element Is Not the Appendix

The greetings at the close of Paul's letters are where most readers check out. In Colossians, they're the argument in bodies. Tychicus—whose name means lucky, which almost certainly means former slave—is the letter carrier. He reads the letter as if he's Paul, which validates him as Paul's man from the first line. Then: Onesimus. Runaway slave. Fugitive from justice. Paul introduces him as "faithful and beloved brother, who is one of you." Everyone in the room knew who Onesimus was.

The Elephant in the Room

Close quarters. Small town. Everybody knows everybody. And standing there is a man the law says should be returned to his owner—or else his presence makes you complicit. Paul has named him in an official capacity, in a public letter, in a room full of people who recognized him. The whole book of Colossians has been arguing that Christ dismantled the rules-based social order. Onesimus is what that argument looks like when it walks through the door. The discomfort of that moment is the point.

The Signature and the Debt

Paul closes in his own hand—indecipherable compared to the professional scribe's text, but distinctly his, legally binding. That connects back to Colossians 2:14: at the cross, Christ wiped out the handwriting that was against us, the debt document. You sign a mortgage and you're on the hook for the number. A relationship is something else. The personal signature at the end of the letter is what makes the whole thing real—and that's the summary of everything Colossians has been saying.

Why God Kept a Letter to a City That Was About to Be Gone

Colossae was destroyed by an earthquake less than two years after Paul wrote. God knew. He had Paul write anyway, at real cost—a professional scribe, a personal courier, the whole enterprise. Toby's argument: the letter wasn't for Colossae. It was for us. If you could keep one of Paul's letters and lose the rest, this is the one—because it tells you that you are free in Christ, nobody can get hooks in you, and that means we can do life together in a way that the world outside Christ simply cannot.

The Landing

The connections are not extra. Aristarchus in prison with Paul, Epaphras working hard on behalf of people who weren't even there, Nympha with the church meeting in her house—these names at the end of the letter are what put legs on the cosmic theology of chapters one and two. The gospel isn't just me and Jesus. It's us-ins in Jesus.

Questions to Think About

  1. At the start of the sermon, Toby had someone stand up front without explanation—just to let that low-level discomfort settle over the room. Have you ever been in a setting where everybody knew the elephant but nobody said it? What was that like?
  2. Toby drew a line between rules that exist to facilitate relationship and rules that exist to keep people inside the system. What's the actual difference between those two kinds of rules?
  3. Paul introduces Onesimus as "faithful and beloved brother, who is one of you"—and the congregation knew he was a runaway slave and a fugitive. What is Paul doing by naming him that way, in that letter, in that room?
  4. Toby said that when things go wrong, he becomes someone who just wants to do the thing and get it done, and the people around him start to feel like inefficiency. Where do you do that—treat the relational part as overhead you cut when things get hard?
  5. "The connections in our life are not extra." What's a relationship in your life you've been treating as extra?
  6. Paul didn't hide Onesimus—he named him publicly in a letter read aloud in a crowded room where people knew exactly who he was. That put the whole congregation at legal risk. If you were in that room, what would you have done with that?
  7. Colossians argues that Christ has ended the rules-based pecking order. If the equivalent of Onesimus showed up in our church—someone the law or the culture says you don't elevate—how would we actually handle it?
  8. Toby named Aristarchus as the kind of person who makes the difference when you're in the hard stretch—the fellow prisoner of war. Who is that person in your life? Tell them this week.